At a glance
- Distinguish official filings from modelled assessments and partner data.
- Period end, filing date and retrieval time have different meanings.
- Keep missing data visible and verify coverage for the actual company.
Different sources answer different questions
Company intelligence can combine registry records, financial filings, court information, publicly available material and partner assessments. These sources have different purposes. A registry record may establish a filed identity, while a credit assessment applies a methodology to available information.
Keep the source type visible. Our company data foundation uses official registry and government sources. Credit scores and suggested limits use multiple verified partners where available. Review the relevant source, methodology and date for the field you intend to use.
Four actual dates in one report
The period end, filing date, credit assessment and report generation date describe different events. Our anonymised sample contains all four. Keeping each date visible prevents the report generation date from being mistaken for the age of the underlying evidence.
United Kingdom · Business support services
Unconsolidated accounts · GBP millions
The actual dates in the example report
- 31 Dec 2024Financial period ends
What period do the accounts describe?
- 24 Sep 2025Accounts filed
When did the document enter the record?
- 25 Sep 2025Latest credit assessment
When was the score and limit entry made?
- 23 Jun 2026Report generated
When was this report assembled?
Source: anonymised historical report, cover, assessment history pp. 7–8 and financial statements pp. 13–18. A report generation date does not make all underlying evidence current to that day.
Read registry and court information in context
Official sources provide important evidence, but a filing should still be checked for the correct entity and period. Companies House describes its checks on company accounts as basic checks, including the correct documents, period and authentication. A filed document is not a substitute for your assessment of its content.
For a court record, retain the court, jurisdiction, case reference, date and status where available. A similarly named company or an old case needs careful matching and interpretation before it influences a material decision.
Need the evidence for your own companies?
Contact UsMake information gaps visible
Public disclosure rules differ across markets and entity types. Missing financials, shareholders or legal records do not prove that there is nothing to find. Distinguish unavailable, not applicable and zero values in your workflow.
For an enterprise evaluation, test coverage against a representative sample of the companies you actually need to review. A global company count does not establish the depth of financials, ownership or credit information for an individual counterparty.
Keep the evidence attached to the decision
Preserve relevant source references, dates and the version of information used in your review, in accordance with your agreement and retention policy. That makes a later challenge easier to investigate and helps reviewers distinguish a changed fact from an earlier misunderstanding.
Use our interactive country and source directory to explore registry, court and financial references, then confirm the fields and update requirements for your company list.
Frequently asked questions
Your questions, answered.
01What is company data lineage?
+
It is the ability to trace information back to its source and understand relevant dates and transformations.
02Does today’s report contain today’s financials?
+
Not necessarily. Financial statements describe a reporting period and may be filed later. Check the period and filing date.
03What is the difference between a filing date and an update date?
+
A filing date relates to submission to a source. An update date relates to when information was refreshed or processed in a service.
04Does registry sourcing guarantee that every filed fact is correct?
+
No. Understand the checks performed by the registry and assess the filing in context.
05Where do credit scores and limits come from?
+
We use multiple verified partners for these assessments where available. Confirm the relevant methodology, date and coverage.
06What should I check in a court record?
+
Check entity matching, jurisdiction, court, reference, date and case status where available.
07Does missing data mean no risk?
+
No. A missing value is an information gap, not evidence of a favourable result.
08Is every field available in every country?
+
No. Disclosure rules, source access and company-specific filings affect availability.
09How should an enterprise assess coverage?
+
Test the required fields against a representative sample of the actual companies and markets in your portfolio.
10Where can I explore your sources?
+
Use the Our Data page to explore country-level registry, court and financial references and discuss your required coverage with the team.
Sources & further reading
Source references provide context. Examples and process suggestions in this article are editorial guidance.
- Annotated historical report and source context
- Companies House · Searching the register
- Companies House · Get information about a company
Published 25 October 2026. General information for company research; apply your organisation’s policies and obtain specialist advice where needed.
Company intelligence for enterprise credit, finance and procurement decisions.
About us →